2010
- 24/05/2010: Andrew was interviewed by Simon Lauder in The World Today, A few atoms bring quantum computing closer, about a nice paper published today by Michelle Simmons and her group in Nature Nanotechnology. For the very definition of eloquent, listen to his reaction when asked if this paper shows that the silicon approach is the one to put your money on (to be fair, he'd only had 2 hours sleep at that stage...)
- 11/05/2010: Our paper on quantum walks was featured in the Faculty of Science Photo of the Week, Photon Goes on Quantum Walk-about. Nice photo Matt! And scrolling down (insect, insect, insect ...) we found that we were also photo of the week back in January, Quantum Computer used to calculate the precise energy of molecular hydrogen.
- 15/04/2010: Our quantum chemistry has been highlighted as one of the Editors'
favourite articles from the first year of Nature Chemistry:

In fact, it was the only article highlighted for February! All the articles are free until the end of June, so if you haven't done so, go download it now. - 10/04/2010: Andrew and Gerard Milburn were both in today's wonderful Science Show on Canada's Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. As always, Robyn Williams does an incomparably good job—well worth a listen!
- 15/03/2010: Our quantum chemistry work is one of 40 featured abstracts on the images page of the American Physical Society March Meeting! This is the largest Physics conference in the world, with over 7500 presentations, 10,000 attendees, and 42 parallel sessions this morning alone. Congratulations team!
- 10/02/2010: There's a writeup of our work at the Italian science blog Science Backstage, Calcolo fotonico. Meraviglioso!
- 03/02/2010: And today we're in the Tehran Times, Engineering the Computer of the future, one atom at a time. Hello to our Iranian readers!
- 02/02/2010: Heh. There's an article by Nick Farrell in the Inquirer, Quantum computers aim to map reality . I love the fact that they make James sound like Baldrick: "James Whitfield ... has a cunning plan".
- 01/02/2010: Charles Choi has an article in MSNBC, Quantum computer simulates molecular reality.
- 28/01/2010: Gosh, on the day Apple announces their iPad, we made Wired! Charles Petit's article Quantum Computer Simulates Hydrogen Molecule Just Right is up now in Wired Science.
- 27/01/2010: There's an article on our work in the Indian Business magazine domain-b.com, Queensland University's quantum computers make light work of Harvard's chemistry.
- 22/01/2010: A wonderful article in the US magazine Science News, by Charles Petit, Quantum computer simulates hydrogen molecule just right. The bit about calcite at the end is a bit of a long bow, but still!
- 21/01/2010: Goodness! There are articles on our Quantum Chemistry work in Chinese on cnBeta.com, 用量子计算机做大学习题, and in Israeli in the Hayadan, מחשב קוונטי לחישוב האנרגיה של מימן. Although the team speak and read seven languages between us, they don't (yet) include Mandarin or Hebrew, so we've no idea what the articles actually say!
- 20/01/2010: In the Oxford Science Blog, there's a fun interview by Pete Wilton of Jacob Biamonte, Quantum simulators & super civilisations.
- 19/01/2010: Hamish Johnston has a great article in Physics World, Quantum computer takes on quantum chemistry. The diagram is particularly nice!
- 17/01/2010: We've made the Mexican press, with an article at Milenio,
Una computadora cuántica ya hizo cálculos. Alán translated his favourite part of the
article for us:
A big cheery g'day from all us convicts to our Mexican readers! (Seriously though, our teams were funded by both the Australian and US governments, and are made up of folk from 8 nations across 4 continents: Australia, Brazil, Croatia, Iran, Italy, Mexico, the UK and the USA. Science is truly international.)The Australians! Wasn't that island an almost depopulated prison colony of England, when Mexico, still called New Spain, was proud of its Royal University, of scientists and researchers informed in physics and chemistry of the state of the art of the XVIII-th century? - 16/01/2010: The Palestine Telegraph has run Andy Extance's article in its Panorama Section.
- 15/01/2010: Andy Extance has a great article at Chemistry World, Quantum computer hits hydrogen bullseye. What a wonderful title! However Andrew wishes to say that he didn't concede, so much as stress, that a system with 522 gates isn't currently possible...
- 14/01/2010: Science Daily cover our press release, Quantum computer calculates exact energy of molecular hydrogen.
- 13/01/2010: There's a great article today at Ars Technica by Casey Johnston, Two-qubit quantum system used to model the hydrogen molecule, and a version of one of the press releases at chemie.de, Quantum computer calculates exact energy of molecular hydrogen.
- 12/01/2010: Popsci have a nice article by Clay Dillow, Quantum Computer Successfully Calculates Exact Energy of Molecular Hydrogen.
- 12/01/2010: Here's an article with a different slant on our work, by Darren Pauli in Computerworld, Aussie quantum experiment challenges Einstein, computer science.
- 11/01/2010: There's a nice and thoughtful article today in New Scientist by Colin Barras, Quantum computers do chemistry.
- 11/01/2010: Julie Barzilay has written a great article in The Harvard Crimson, Scientists Employ Quantum Computer; there's a report based on the Harvard press release in the Harvard Gazette, Quantum (not digital) computing; and our work—wth a lovely photo of Alán— has made Harvard's main page. Nice one!
- 11/01/2010: Goodness: there are reports on our Quantum Chemistry experiment at Nanowerk, eScience News, Softpedia, Next Big Future, Innovations Report, Yahoo News, Azonano and RedOrbit.
- 11/01/2010: Well that was quick! Today's PhysOrg has an article on our recent quantum chemistry experiment: Quantum Computer Measures Energy in Molecular Hydrogen.
- 02/01/2010: The 10 Biggest Questions in Physics was broadcast today as part of Quirks and Quarks holiday offerings. Andrew hasn't had a chance to listen yet, but is bravely putting up the link anyhow... Update. Oh, that was fun! There was a pretty clear division between big questions about big things and big questions about small things...

